Article 7:1 of the General Administrative Law Act (Awb) requires that an applicant first lodge a bezwaar (administrative objection) with the issuing authority before going to court. The objection is the in-house re-examination of the decision. The deadline is six weeks under Awb 6:7. The IND then has six weeks under Awb 7:10 to decide on the objection, extendable once by six weeks. Objection is the gate that controls access to the district court.
Objection · the mandatory administrative-objection step under Awb 7:1
Awb 7:1 lays down a procedural rule: before someone can appeal a decision in court (beroep under Awb 8:1), they must first lodge an objection with the body that issued the decision. The objection gives the authority a chance to re-examine its own decision, possibly correct mistakes, and either withdraw the decision, modify it, or maintain it. Only after the objection decision is in hand can the applicant proceed to the district court.
The objection must be lodged within six weeks of the decision-date printed on the IND's letter (Awb 6:7). Day one is the day after the decision-date. An objection filed on day forty-three is non-ontvankelijk (inadmissible), and the decision becomes final and unappealable. There are very narrow exceptions (Awb 6:11) for excusably-late objection; these are rarely accepted.
Six weeks. Counted from the day after the decision-date. Missed by a single day means the case is closed and unappealable forever. Calendar the date the day the refusal letter arrives.
An objection without grounds is called a pro-forma objection — it preserves the six-week deadline and the applicant has a brief term (set by the IND, typically four weeks) to file the grounds. Pro-forma objection is normal when the applicant is gathering documents or finding a lawyer.
| Step | Statute | Deadline |
|---|---|---|
| Lodge bezwaar (after refusal) | Awb 6:7 | Within 6 weeks |
| IND decision on objection | Awb 7:10(1) | 6 weeks |
| Optional extension by IND | Awb 7:10(3) | +6 weeks (max) |
| Notice of Default if no objection decision | Awb 4:17 / 6:12 | After the 6 or 12 weeks |
| Court appeal (beroep) after objection decision | Awb 8:1 | Within 6 weeks of objection decision |
So: from the moment the objection is filed, the IND has six weeks (or twelve with an extension) to decide. If they do not, the same Notice-of-Default mechanism applies — Awb 4:17 daily penalty (dwangsom) starts to run, Awb 6:12 fictive-refusal route opens to court.
Under Awb 7:2 the IND must offer the applicant the chance to be heard before deciding the objection, unless the applicant waives or the objection is manifestly inadmissible. The hearing is held in front of the IND's hoor-en-adviescommissie (hearing and advisory committee). The applicant can attend with a lawyer or representative. The committee writes a recommendation that the IND-decision-maker is expected to follow but is not strictly bound by.
MigrationProvision's procedural lever (the Notice of Default under Awb 4:17 + 6:12) is for the situation where the IND has not yet issued a decision. Once the IND issues a refusal and the applicant is in the objection phase, the substantive arguments belong with a lawyer or specialised NGO.
Where we are still useful in the objection phase: if the IND does not decide on the objection within Awb 7:10's six (or twelve) weeks, the same Notice-of-Default mechanism applies. We file a Notice citing Awb 4:17, the daily penalty starts to run, and the route to Awb 6:12 (fictive refusal) opens. The substantive objection arguments still belong with the lawyer; we just keep the objection moving.
Objection generates the same two-clock pattern as the primary procedure. The primary clock (Awb 7:10) is the IND's decision-term on the objection. The secondary clock (Awb 4:17 daily penalty) starts when the primary clock has expired and a Notice of Default has been served. The two run independently: a decision on the objection stops the primary clock but does not extinguish daily penalty that has already accrued.